|
|  |
|
Legal Needs
| [This Network is not currently active and cannot accept new posts] | | Topics |
|
|
| |
| Aug 15, 2008 2:22 am |
|
re: re: re: What are Law-makers doing ? |
| charuhasan
| |
Swethaji,
It is easy to ask questions and difficult to answer. Probably that is why they are all called questions of law. There is a subtle difference between a questions of law and questions of fact. Your first question is a question of law.
Now listen to this,
If Swethaji is A and and Charu hasan is B. Now If A tells B with a crowd of people who can give evidence of all questions fact “You are a very stupid actor and fit to give up acting along with such other actors who follow your method , so that common is not fooled into believing what is good cinema!” The statement is quite “rude” and may be disapproved by all actors in general and B in particular. That B assaults A is a crime under sec 352 I.P.C, however rude the original remark may be.
If A tells B that he is rapist thief and a swindler, still B can only prosecute A for defamation. A physical assault can become punishable. Only the extent of punishment could be less as a rule of applying “grave and sudden provocation’ applicable to reduce a culpable homicide amounting to murder into one not amounting to murder, may come into operation.
Have I confused you enough? Please give the issue to your lawyer asking him to meet your enemy’s lawyer to arrive at a settlement. If you go to court the two lawyers will have their square meal and you and your enemy will have to work harder to get your next meal.
Charuhasan
Private Reply to charuhasan (new win) |
|
| |
|
